I attended the Scripps Clinic 'New Treatments in Chronic Liver
Disease' conference this past weekend in La Jolla, CA. There were three
sessions focusing just on HCV - 'Management of Chronic Hepatitis C in the DAA
Era'; 'Controversy - Should We Treat IL28B CC Patients Without DAAs?' and the
'New Directions for HCV Therapy (2012 - 2014)'. Adrian Di Bisceglie MD,
Paul Pockros MD and Anna Lok, MD - all three superstars of Hepatology - did the honors. Below are some of the highlights (for me, anyway) in
terms of the future of HCV treatment. Reductionism at its most subjective.
·
The future of Interferon & Ribavirin:
o Interferon will likely be
with us for at least the next 5 years, but may be regulated to patients that
are tough to treat (i.e. cirrhotics, G1a)
o Ribavirin will be a
mainstay of therapy for the majority of patients.
o A nuc may be able to
replace RBV in a small subset of patients in combination therapy (PI +nuc +
nonnuc, for example) The subset of patients were characterized as G2 & G3,
non-cirrhotic, low BMI, non-smoking and/or post-transplant / dialysis patients
and perhaps G1b with CC allele).
o
The economic ramifications of this strategy where
examined. if a generic like RBV worked just as well as a nuc, then why use two
or more DAAs where the cost of treatment will likely be much higher?
·
Ribavirin dose reduction with current therapy:
o
Docs doing CDCs every
two weeks. When patient drops below 10 g/Dl, theydrop RBV down to 600. If that doesn’t provide enough EPO is added.
o
Approval of EPO an
issue – may take three weeks, what do we do then?
o
One doctor on the
panel said “we don’t know how how we can go with RBV. Can we stop RBV for a
couple of days until the patient normalizes? We don’t know.”
o
Another doctor on the
panel replied that the current data on stopping RBV is “inadequate” (very
vociferous on this). Referenced the HCV Target registry
Mike Fried was involved in to take a closer look at this issue. Cautioned
against this until the data is more clear.
·
New treatment notables:
o
GS-7977 + RBV (no INF)
much less likely to cause anemia than current DAA therapy. Referenced a
slide from the ELECTRON study that showed only an average of a 2 g drop in
hemoglobin, no reduction in absolute neutrophil count. Also much less
propensity for DDIs than current DAA therapy.
o
All agreed that the
data they are most anxiously awaiting is the G1 treatment naïve data from the
ELECTRON trial with GS-7997 + RBV (to be presented at EASL)
o
Doctor on the panel
referenced ELECTRON demographics – G1a, no cirrhosis. “We need to see VERY high
SVR rates in this INF-free trial in this population. I’m looking for 100% SVR”.
o
Resistance will always
be a concern given the error-prone, highly replicative capacity of the virus.
Less of a concern with the polymerase inhibitors because of the higher barrier
to resistance.
o
Future much more
certain for polymerase inhibitors and protease inhibitors than cyclophilin inhibitors
at this point.
o
Less danger of
drug-drug interactions with upcoming therapies – good news for post-transplant,
dialysis and HIV/HCV co-infected patients.
· Timeline predictions on
evolution of HCV therapy:
o
Q4 2013/ Q1 2014 –
Quad therapy vs new triple therapy options (PI + nuc/nonnuc + PEG/RBV)
o Q4 2013/Q1 2014 IFN-free regimens for G2/3 and
perhaps G1b (w/ CC allele) and for those intolerant to IFN. (PI
+nuc/nonnuc/NS5A w/+ RBV)…. Maybe w/out RBV for small segment of patients.
No comments:
Post a Comment