Vertex Pharmaceuticals / Alios BioPharma HCV nuc update...

Posted on 9-25-12 on ClinicaSpace.com. Vertex Pharmaceuticals will continue to develop one nucleotide inhibtior in it's collaboration with Alios BioPharm, ALS-2200 (also known as VX-135), while ending development of ALS-2158 due to lack of efficacy. Vertex is planning on moving ALS-2200 to an all-oral, interferon-free combination Phase II trial in genotype 1 patients later this year. 

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (VRTX) Ends Work on One Hepatitis C Drug, Continues Another; Stock Down

9/25/2012 7:41:57 AM

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., Sep 25, 2012 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- --- ALS-2200: Data from additional cohort of seven-day viral kinetic study with ALS-2200 (200 mg, QD) in combination with ribavirin show median 4.18 log10 reduction in HCV RNA with 5 of 8 people below the limit of quantification; treatment was well-tolerated -

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated and its collaborator Alios BioPharma, Inc. today announced results from a viral kinetic study of the adenosine nucleotide analogue pro-drug ALS-2158 for the treatment of hepatitis C. Data showed that seven days of dosing with up to 900 mg of ALS-2158 was well-tolerated in people with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C, but that there was insufficient antiviral activity to warrant proceeding with further clinical development. The companies also announced new data from an additional cohort of an ongoing viral kinetic study of the uridine nucleotide analogue pro-drug ALS-2200 in combination with ribavirin. There was a median 4.18 log10 reduction from baseline in HCV RNA after seven days of dosing with a once-daily 200 mg dose of ALS-2200 in combination with ribavirin in people with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C who were new to treatment (n=8). Five patients achieved HCV RNA levels below the limit of quantification

Similar to previously announced data from the monotherapy cohort, ALS-2200 was well-tolerated, no patients discontinued due to adverse events and there were no serious adverse events. Data from the ALS-2200 study will be presented in an oral presentation at The Liver Meeting(R), the 63rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) in Boston, November 9 to 13, 2012.

"Our goal is to develop all-oral regimens that are well-tolerated and provide a high rate of viral cure in a broad population of people with chronic hepatitis C," said Robert Kauffman, M.D., Ph.D., Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer at Vertex. "We're making good progress and expect to begin all-oral Phase 2 combination studies by the end of this year."

Pending discussions with regulatory agencies, Vertex is planning one Phase 2 study to evaluate ALS-2200 (VX-135) in combination with ribavirin, and one to evaluate ALS-2200 (VX-135) in combination with INCIVEK(R) (telaprevir), the company's approved protease inhibitor for people with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. These studies will evaluate 12 total weeks of treatment with a primary endpoint of SVR12 (sustained viral response:undetectable hepatitis C virus 12 weeks after the end of treatment) in people with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C.

About ALS-2200

ALS-2200 is a uridine nucleotide analogue pro-drug that appears to have a high barrier to drug resistance based on in vitro studies. It is designed to inhibit the replication of the hepatitis C virus by acting on the NS5B polymerase. In vitro studies of the compound showed antiviral activity across all genotypes, or forms, of the hepatitis C virus, including genotypes more prevalent outside of the United States.

Vertex gained worldwide rights to ALS-2200 through an exclusive licensing agreement signed with Alios BioPharma, Inc. in June 2011. The agreement also includes a research program that will focus on the discovery of additional nucleotide analogues that act on hepatitis C polymerase. Vertex has the option to select additional compounds for development emerging from the research program.

About INCIVEK

INCIVEK(R) (telaprevir) tablets is an oral medicine that acts directly on the hepatitis C virus protease, an enzyme essential for viral replication.

INCIVEK was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in May 2011 and by Health Canada in August 2011 for use in combination with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin for adults with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C with compensated liver disease (some level of damage to the liver but the liver still functions), including cirrhosis (scarring of the liver). INCIVEK is approved for people who are new to treatment, and for people who were treated previously with interferon-based treatment but who did not achieve a sustained viral response, or viral cure (relapsers, partial responders and null responders).

Vertex developed telaprevir in collaboration with Janssen and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma. Vertex has rights to commercialize telaprevir in North America where it is being marketed under the brand name INCIVEK (in-SEE-veck). Janssen has rights to commercialize telaprevir in Europe, South America, Australia, the Middle East and certain other countries. In September 2011, telaprevir was approved in the European Union and Switzerland. Telaprevir is known as INCIVO(R) in Europe. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma has rights to commercialize telaprevir in Japan and certain Far East countries. In September 2011, telaprevir was approved in Japan and is known as Telavic(R).

IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION

Indication

INCIVEK(R) (telaprevir) is a prescription medicine used with the medicines peginterferon alfa and ribavirin to treat chronic (lasting a long time) hepatitis C genotype 1 infection in adults with stable liver problems, who have not been treated before or who have failed previous treatment. It is not known if INCIVEK is safe and effective in children under 18 years of age.

Important Safety Information

INCIVEK should always be taken in combination with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin. Ribavirin may cause birth defects or death of an unborn baby. Therefore, a patient should not take INCIVEK combination treatment if she is pregnant or may become pregnant, or if he is a man with a sexual partner who is pregnant. Patients must use two forms of effective birth control during treatment and for the 6 months after treatment with these medicines. Hormonal forms of birth control, including birth control pills, vaginal rings, implants or injections, may not work during treatment with INCIVEK.

INCIVEK and other medicines can affect each other and can also cause side effects that can be serious or life threatening. There are certain medicines patients cannot take with INCIVEK combination treatment. Patients should tell their healthcare providers about all the medicines they take, including prescription and non-prescription medicines, vitamins and herbal supplements.

INCIVEK can cause serious side effects including skin reactions, rash and anemia that can be severe. The most common side effects of INCIVEK include itching, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, anal or rectal problems, taste changes and tiredness. There are other possible side effects of INCIVEK, and side effects associated with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin also apply to INCIVEK combination treatment. Patients should tell their healthcare providers about any side effect that bothers them or doesn't go away.

Please see full Prescribing Information for INCIVEK including the Medication Guide, available at www.INCIVEK.com .

About Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C is a serious liver disease caused by the hepatitis C virus, which is spread through direct contact with the blood of infected people and ultimately affects the liver.(1) Chronic hepatitis C can lead to serious and life-threatening liver problems, including liver damage, cirrhosis, liver failure or liver cancer.(1) Though many people with hepatitis C may not experience symptoms, others may have symptoms such as fatigue, fever, jaundice and abdominal pain.(1)

Unlike HIV and hepatitis B virus, chronic hepatitis C can be cured.(2) However, approximately 60 percent of people do not achieve SVR,(3,4,5)or viral cure,(6) after treatment with 48 weeks of pegylated-interferon and ribavirin alone. If treatment is not successful and a person does not achieve a viral cure, they remain at an increased risk for progressive liver disease.(7,8)

More than 170 million people worldwide are chronically infected with hepatitis C.(6) In the United States, up to 5 million people have chronic hepatitis C and 75 percent of them are unaware of their infection.(9,10)Hepatitis C is four times more prevalent in the United States compared to HIV.(10) The majority of people with hepatitis C in the United States were born between 1945 and 1965, accounting 82 percent of people with the disease.(11)Hepatitis C is the leading cause of liver transplantations in the United States and is reported to contribute to 15,000 deaths annually.(12,13)By 2029, total annual medical costs in the United States for people with hepatitis C are expected to more than double, from $30 billion in 2009 to approximately $85 billion.(10)

About Vertex

Vertex creates new possibilities in medicine. Our team discovers, develops and commercializes innovative therapies so people with serious diseases can lead better lives.

Vertex scientists and our collaborators are working on new medicines to cure or significantly advance the treatment of hepatitis C, cystic fibrosis, rheumatoid arthritis and other life-threatening diseases.

Founded more than 20 years ago in Cambridge, Mass., we now have ongoing worldwide research programs and sites in the U.S., U.K. and Canada. Today, Vertex has more than 2,000 employees around the world, and for three years in a row, Science magazine has named Vertex one of its Top Employers in the life sciences.

Vertex's press releases are available at www.vrtx.com .

About Alios BioPharma

Alios BioPharma is a biotechnology company located in South San Francisco, California, that is developing novel medicines aimed at the treatment of viral diseases. Alios has an innovative team of highly experienced scientists and clinical researchers who are developing direct acting antiviral agents against several human viral pathogens of public health importance including HCV, RSV, Influenza and other chronic, acute and emerging viral diseases. The overall goal for the Alios therapeutic platform is to maximize patient benefits in areas of high unmet medical need through optimization of potency, safety and tolerability.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This press release contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, Dr. Kauffman's statements in the third paragraph of this press release and statements regarding (i) data supporting the advancement of ALS-2200 into Phase 2 all-oral studies this year and (ii) Vertex's plans regarding the design of these Phase 2 studies. While the company believes the forward-looking statements contained in this press release are accurate, there are a number of factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. Those risks and uncertainties include, among other things, that the initiation of Phase 2 studies of ALS-2200 may be delayed or prevented, outcomes from any future studies of ALS-2200 may not be favorable and the other risks listed under Risk Factors in Vertex's annual report and quarterly reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and available through Vertex's website at www.vrtx.com . Vertex disclaims any obligation to update the information contained in this press release as new information becomes available.

(VRTX-GEN)

References:

(1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Hepatitis C Fact Sheet: CDC Viral Hepatitis. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hepatitis/HCV/PDFs/HepCGeneralFactSheet.pdf Updated June 2010. Accessed September 21, 2012.

(2) Pearlman BL and Traub N. Sustained Virologic Response to Antiviral Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: A Cure and So Much More. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Apr;52(7):889-900.

(3) Manns MP, McHutchison JG, Gordon SC, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin compared with interferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2001;358:958-965.

(4) Fried MW, Shiffman ML, Reddy KR, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus infection. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:975-982.

(5) McHutchison JG, Lawitz EJ, Shiffman ML, et al; IDEAL Study Team. Peginterferon alfa-2b or alfa-2a with ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C infection. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:580-593.

(6) Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff, LB. Diagnosis, management and treatment of hepatitis C; An update. Hepatology. 2009;49 (4):1-40.

(7) Morgan TR, Ghany MG, Kim HY, Snow KK, Lindsay K, Lok AS. Outcome of sustained virological responders and non-responders in the Hepatitis C Antiviral Long-Term Treatment Against Cirrhosis (HALT-C) trial. Hepatology. 2008;50(Suppl 4):357A (Abstract 115).

(8) Veldt BJ, Heathcote J, Wedmeyer H. Sustained virologic response and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2007; 147: 677-684.

(9) Chak, E, et. al. Hepatitis C Virus Infection In USA: An Estimate of True Prevalence. Liver Intl. 2011;1096 -1098.

(10) Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Hepatitis and liver cancer: a national strategy for prevention and control of hepatitis B and C. Colvin HM and Mitchell AE, ed. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2010/Hepatitis-and-Liver-Cancer-A-National-Strategy-for-Prevention-and-Control-of-Hepatitis-B-and-C.aspx Updated January 11, 2010. Accessed September 21, 2012.

(11) Smith, BD, et al. Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Prevalence, Correlates and Predictors among Persons Born from 1945 through 1965, United States, 1999-2008. AASLD 2011 Annual Meeting.

(12) Volk MI, Tocco R, Saini S, Lok, ASF. Public health impact of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C in the United States. Hepatology. 2009;50(6):1750-1755.

(13) S.D. Holmberg, K.N. Ly., et.al. The Growing Burden of Mortality Associated with Viral Hepatitis in the United States, 1999-2007. AASLD 2011 Annual Meeting.

SOURCE: Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated

Achillion Pharmaceuticals HCV pipeline suddenly looking attractive...

Posted 8/29/12 on Business Week.com. Achillion Pharmaceuticals, once regarded as an also ran by Big Pharma suddenly looks sexy again as clinical holds and pipeline failures stymie drug development with Idenix and BMS. Rumors of a takeover has made Achillion stock surge in the past couple of days. The HCV drug development space continues to be one of the most dynamic in pharma, there is definitely no shortage of spills and thrills. 

Achillion Deal Looming as Hepatitis Drugs Fail: Real M&A

By Ryan Flinn and Will Robinson on August 29, 2012

Achillion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACHN), the developer of hepatitis C treatments that was passed over by potential acquirers in the last year, is poised to draw renewed interest after setbacks by rival drugmakers.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (BMY) last week said it was abandoning an experimental hepatitis C pill it obtained through its February purchase of Inhibitex Inc. after one patient died and others were hospitalized while taking the drug in a study. This week, Idenix Pharmaceuticals Inc. said U.S. regulators halted its study of a similar therapy, marking the second hold on clinical trials for the company this month.

With the market for new hepatitis C treatments projected to reach $20 billion by 2020 and Achillion facing no delays in two drugs under development, Piper Jaffray Cos. and William Blair & Co. say the $481 million company could gain fresh attention as a takeover candidate for Merck & Co. (MRK), Roche (ROG) Holding AG and Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VRTX) A suitor could pay a premium of as much as 79 percent to Achillion’s stock price and still acquire the New Haven, Connecticut-based company for less than its peak market value earlier this year, when takeovers and merger speculation spurred a surge in hepatitis C drugmakers’ shares.

“The frenzy has been taken out of the space, but I still think Achillion is very attractive” because its therapies have the potential to be the best of their type, Ted Tenthoff, a New York-based analyst for Piper Jaffray, said in a telephone interview. “We expect the wave of consolidation to continue. Achillion is clearly a target.”

Drug Development
Joe Truitt, Achillion’s chief commercial officer, said it wasn’t appropriate to comment on the company’s development plans, including the possibility of a takeover.

“We’ll make the best strategic options as they come to us, but for right now, we’re developing our drugs and getting them into combinations and making them available to patients,” Truitt said in a phone interview.

Today, shares of Achillion rose 3.5 percent to $6.86 at 9:45 a.m. in New York, the second-biggest gain among 116 stocks in the Nasdaq Biotechnology Index.

Hepatitis C is a viral infection that can cause liver damage and is estimated to affect 180 million people worldwide, according to the National Institutes of Health. Rising deaths among so-called baby boomers from the infection prompted U.S. health officials to declare in May that all of those born from 1946 to 1964 are at risk and should be tested.

Achillion is among several companies racing to develop hepatitis C cures that would replace the standard year-long injectable treatment that can cause flu-like symptoms.

Four Classes
There are four new classes of drugs under development to cure hepatitis C. Each work in different ways to stop the virus from replicating, and can be effective against one or several subtypes of the disease.

Drugmakers such as Abbott Laboratories (ABT), Achillion, Bristol- Myers, Gilead Sciences Inc. (GILD), Merck and Vertex have been testing these therapies, either alone or together, with varying degrees of success. The promise of a market that Achillion Chief Executive Officer Michael Kishbauch estimates will grow to $20 billion by 2020 spurred at least three acquisitions since October.

The biggest deal was Gilead’s $10.8 billion acquisition of Pharmasset Inc., announced in November, which came a month after Roche agreed to buy Anadys Pharmaceuticals Inc. for about $230 million. Bristol-Myers followed in January by announcing its $2.5 billion purchase of Inhibitex.

Fresh Look
Achillion’s Kishbauch said in November that the company was in “advanced discussions” with potential partners or acquirers. Its shares then reached a five-year high of $12.38 in February on takeover speculation before falling (ACHN) 46 percent since then as no deal materialized.

Now, with Bristol-Myers stopping development of the drug it bought from Inhibitex, and Idenix (IDIX) halting testing of a similar therapy, Achillion could attract a fresh look from companies seeking hepatitis treatments to use on their own or in combination with their existing therapies, said Liisa Bayko, a Chicago-based analyst with JMP Securities LLC.

Achillion is testing two types of drugs. By combining several classes of these new hepatitis C drugs, doctors may be able to limit the virus’ ability to infect, mimicking the strategy that a decade earlier helped turn HIV from a killer disease to a controlled one.

During the first quarter, Achillion will be reporting on how effective its two therapies work in combination. Good data could entice competitors to bid, Bayko said.

‘Well-Positioned’
“By the first quarter of next year, we could be a very different company,” Achillion’s Truitt said. “If that combination data comes through, then we really have a commercially viable, competitive combination that will put everybody on notice.”

“We’re pretty optimistic for Achillion,” Bayko said in a phone interview. “They’ll be well-positioned to be a candidate to be taken out, because right now, there are very few options if you want to get involved in hep C, in terms of combinations that are more advanced that are still in clinical development.”

Bayko said that while she expects a suitor to wait for the data on the drugs before making an offer, Achillion still could fetch as much as $10 a share if a company bid for it now, 51 percent more than its closing price yesterday.

Piper Jaffray’s Tenthoff said Achillion could lure suitors such as Merck, Roche and Vertex as they seek to compete against Gilead, which is seen by analysts as having the most promising hepatitis C drug. Gilead is poised to start testing two of its therapies together in a single pill this year, putting it on track to request U.S. regulatory approval for the drug in 2014.

Gilead Bid
Ronald Rogers, a spokesman for Merck, said the company doesn’t comment on speculation when asked whether the Whitehouse Station, New Jersey-based drugmaker was interested in Achillion, while an e-mail to Basel, Switzerland-based Roche’s media relations office wasn’t returned. Megan Pace, a spokeswoman for Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Vertex, declined to comment.

Even Gilead could seek to acquire Achillion as a way to remove a potential competitor and bolster its position, said Peter Kolchinsky, co-founder and general partner at RA Capital Management LLC, which oversees $300 million, including Achillion shares.

“Gilead could solidify its supremacy if it had Achillion’s drugs, each best in its respective class based on what we know so far,” Kolchinsky said in an interview. “Acquiring Achillion would also be a wise defensive move for Gilead, keeping it from falling into a competitor’s hands or from becoming an independent low-cost competitor.”

Safety Concerns
Cara Miller, a spokeswoman for Foster City, California- based Gilead, said the company (GILD) doesn’t comment on market speculation.

Brian Skorney, an analyst with Brean Murray Carret & Co. in New York, says Achillion won’t be a takeover target soon because it has “a lot more to prove” with clinical data next year. Other companies that developed hepatitis C treatments like Pharmasset and Inhibitex proved their drugs were effective before they were bought, and the only remaining question about their products was safety, he said.

The safety problems that challenged the drug Bristol-Myers bought from Inhibitex and the regulatory holds that Idenix faces show how much risk is still left in the market for hepatitis C treatments, said Les Funtleyder, a fund manager focused on the health-care industry at New York-based Poliwogg.

“What’s that phrase, ‘Once burned, twice shy?’” Funtleyder said in a phone call. “If someone was to repeat what happened to Bristol, shareholders would start to ask questions about management’s judgment.”

Cheaper Now
Still, after the drop in Achillion’s stock this year, a buyer would be taking on the risk of the therapies potentially failing at a lower price tag.

During the past 12 months, acquirers that announced deals for biomedical companies paid 65 percent more than the target’s average 20-day stock price in transactions greater than $500 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. A bidder for Achillion could offer a premium of as much 79 percent to yesterday’s stock price and still get the drugmaker for less than its record market value of $863 million in February.

The market for treating the viral infection is too big to be dominated by Gilead alone, so large drugmakers may have the appetite to acquire a company such as Idenix or Achillion once they produce sufficient data on the safety and effectiveness of their drugs, said Y. Katherine Xu, a New York-based analyst at William Blair. Kelly Barry, a spokeswoman for Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Idenix, didn’t return a voicemail message and e-mail sent after business hours about whether the company has been approached by suitors.

“Both Idenix and Achillion, their strategy is to sell themselves,” Xu said. “Timeline-wise, these two used to be similar, but now Achillion may be a little bit ahead.”

To contact the reporters on this story: Ryan Flinn in San Francisco at rflinn@bloomberg.net; Will Robinson in New York at wrobinson11@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Sarah Rabil at srabil@bloomberg.net; Reg Gale at rgale5@bloomberg.net.

Medical Device industry makes a run at Pharma in the HCV space...

Posted 8/9/12 on The OTC Investor.com. Aethlon Medical is serious about it's Hemopurifier, a blood filtration device being looked at for several indications. If it is indeed capable of lowering HCV viral load to a point where pegylated interferon and ribavirin could be more effective and bump up response rates over 50% with less toxicity... and can do so at a cost lower than that of Direct Acting Antiviral combination therapy... Aethlon may be on to something. Yet another reason not to dismiss interferon just yet. 

Bristol’s Halted Hepatitis C Trial Reinforces Aethlon Medical’s Non-Toxic Therapy
By Paul Archie · Thursday, August 9th, 2012

In the biotechnology world, the sun rises and set around the two key words “safety” and “efficacy.”  A serious safety concern last week resulted in Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY) voluntarily halting its ongoing Phase 2 study of BMS-986094, a drug in development as a new indication for hepatitis C as part of the drug maker’s quest for an all-oral regimen for hep C.  A patient who had received a 200 milligram dose of the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, or “nuke,” suffered heart failure; causing Bristol to stop the trial and begin evaluating participants to determine any correlation between the new drug and the heart damage.

In February, Bristol paid $2.5 billion to acquire Inhibitex, a 163-percent premium to the valuation of Inhibitex at that time, primarily to snag its hepatitis C drug candidate (then called INX-189).  The halted trial could seriously hamper Bristol in its race with Gilead (NASDAQ: GILD) and Abbott Labs (NYSE: ABT) to bring a new hepatitis C drug to market.  It is widely expected that an all-oral drug therapy for the liver disease that affects about 170 million people across the world will generate billions annually in sales.  It is the reason that Bristol paid the premium for Inhibitex and Gilead dished-out $11.1 billion last November to acquire Pharmassets and its hep C drug in development.

Investors that recognize the upside potential of new therapies for hepatitis C should be taking a close look at Aethlon Medical (OTCBB: AEMD), the maker of a first-in-class blood filtration device called the Hemopurifier®.  Recently released clinical research by Aethlon showed that the two most recent hepatitis C-infected patients to receive its Hemopurifier® therapy in combination with the standard of care peginterferon+ribavirin (PR) drug therapy achieved undetectable viral load at day-7.  In lay terms, that means that none of the hepatitis C virus was found in the patients’ bloodstream after seven days of treatment.

As an adjunct, the Aethlon Hemopurifier® selectively targets the rapid clearance of the hepatitis C virus from the entire circulatory system to improve benefit, dose, duration and tolerability of drug therapies.  Drugs, like that of Bristol, Gilead or Abbott, carry substantial safety risks because they are “additive” in nature, meaning that they are putting a foreign substance into the body.  Aethlon’s Hemopurifier® is “subtractive.”  It removes the virus through a proprietary filtering process, which does not carry the same, potentially deadly toxicity risks that can cost major pharma billions to finally realize.

The OTC Investor (http://s.tt/1kpgX)

The Street.com: Rethinking Idenix Pharma in Wake of Bristol's Hep C Blow Up...

Posted 8/6/12 on The Street.com. The Streets's Nathan Sadeghi -Nejad weighs in on the current - and seemingly hyperactive - HCV drug development space. He's right, the last couple of weeks have been a whirlwind of surprises - Novartis giving Idenix the rights to it's HCV drugs back, BMS's BMS-094 seemingly taking it's last breath, Gilead co-formulating it's nuc with it's NS5A inhibitor just to name a few.  BMS has had a rough time of it in the HCV drug development space. It's $885 million purchase of ZymoGenetics with it's Peg Lambda seemed like a great move in 2010, before the advent of the idea of potential interferon-free therapy (I still think Peg Lambda may be a surprise dark horse - I'm still cautious on the potential 'interferon free' except in certain cases), Then consider the $2.5 billion purchase of Inhibitex, whence the doomed BMS-094 nuc came from leaving BMS's NS5A inhibitor without a BMS-owned partner. It's other late-stage HCV drugs aren't much to sneeze at. Ouch. Sadeghi-Nejad makes some other observations (Gilead - yes. Idenix - nuc is too close to BMS-094, maybe a toxicity issue but no safety signals to support. Vertex nuc looks powerful, but too far from market to mean much) that you may or may not agree with. Definitely a good read if you're watching the HCV drug development race.

Rethinking Idenix Pharma in Wake of Bristol's Hep C Blow Up

By Nathan Sadeghi-Nejad - 08/06/12 - 7:00 AM EDT
Tickers in this article: IDIX BMY GILD VRTX

NEW YORK (TheStreet) -- Last week, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMY) confirmed my previously reported suspicions by abruptly halting a Phase II trial of BMS-094 (formerly INX-189) -- a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, or "nuc," for the treatment of hepatitis C. One patient in the study experienced major cardiovascular toxicity, forcing Bristol-Myers to stop dosing BMS-094.

The company has provided few follow-up details but it appears as if BMS-094 is dead.

That means Bristol-Myers' $2.5 billion acquisition of Inhibitex (from where BMS-094 originated) has proven to be a complete zero in less than seven months. I'm not sure if that's a mergers-and-acquisition disaster record, but it's probably close.

The demise of BMS-094 has also reshaped the Hep C landscape. Let's review who still stands and where. For some assistance, I turned to John Tucker, a scientific analyst with BioMedTracker, a division of Sagient Research. Tucker recently published an excellent overview on Hep C drugs in development and he's been all over BMS-094 and its implications.

At this point, combining a "nuc" with an NS5A inhibitor and the generic antiviral drug ribavirin seems to be the most promising "all oral" Hep C regimen in clinical development. This makes Bristol-Myers' daclatasvir, an NS5A inhibitor essentially useless on its own. The company's other later-stage hep C drug candidates -- the non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor BMS-791325 and the protease inhibitor asunaprevir -- have only modest efficacy or toxicity issues, or both.

Bristol-Myers may continue to beg but I'm convinced Gilead Sciences(GILD) has no interest in a daclatasvir partnership. As I noted recently, Gilead's nuc-NS5A combination -- GS-7977 and GS-5885 -- has made rapid clinical progress and will start pivotal trials this year. In sum, the BMS-094 blowup leaves Bristol-Myers up a proverbial creek in Hep C. Although this failure has little long-term financial impact, Bristol-Myers' apparent inability to foresee this compound's risks raises concerns about the company's R&D and business development capabilities.

Gilead emerges a big winner. I have long believed Gilead would be first to market with an all-oral Hep C regimen, but Bristol-Myers has handed the company a much bigger lead. (I also still doubt the size of the commercial market for Hep C, but that's another issue.)

I initially considered Idenix Pharmaceuticals(IDIX) and its nuc IDX-184 a winner emerging from the BMS-094 blowup. Now, I'm less sure.

IDX-184 has a chemical structure that is similar to both BMS-094 and Pharmasset's PSI-938, another Hep C nuc that was killed off by toxicity problems last year. More specifically, the active moiety of IDX-184 -- the part of the molecule that makes the drug work -- appears to be similar to the active moieties of both BMS-094 and PSI-938. That could be a big problem.

Chemists often attach nonessential atoms to a drug candidate in an attempt to change the compound's overall physiological behavior. As the drug is metabolized in the body, those byproducts are cleaved and the working core of the drug -- the active moiety -- is unveiled.

The byproducts are usually innocuous, but not always. For example, it's not clear whether the side effects that killed BMS-094 were caused by the active moiety or by 1-naphthol, a toxic metabolite of the drug. Similarly, PSI-938's fatal flaw remains unclear. This worries me, and it should worry Idenix bulls.

Idenix does have a very reasonable defense. Management contends IDX-184 is nearly entirely targeted to the liver and metabolized poorly in other cell types. Further, IDX-184 seems to be more slowly metabolized by the liver than BMS-094. These factors certainly lessen the risk of toxicity. Thus far, Idenix has treated roughly 60 patients for 12 weeks with IDX-184 and observed no safety signals, including no cardiovascular side effects.

That's encouraging, but I would prefer to overpay for Idenix after there are more data on IDX-184. I would reduce or eliminate long exposure to Idenix until the drug's safety has been more completely established.

Two more Idenix red flags that make me cautious: First, Novartis(NVS), Idenix's partner for nearly a decade, ended the relationship last week. I understand that Novartis wasn't much of a collaborator so walking away might actually be a net positive for Idenix. But I still tend to view pharma-biotech breakups as a negative, although in this case a bit less so.

Second, Idenix completed a major secondary offering only two days after the Novartis breakup. Idenix sold 22 million shares at $8.00 per share or 28% below recent highs. Although I generally support equity issuances at management's discretion, the company still had at least $90 million in the bank. Shareholders should feel justifiably frustrated at this seemingly unnecessary rush dilution of the existing investor base. I worry that the timing signals dark clouds on the horizon.

Right before the Bristol-Myers news, Vertex Pharmaceuticals(VRTX) announced impressive early clinical data for ALS-2200, a nucleotide analogue licensed from Alios BioPharma. After seven days of dosing, the eight treated patients showed a median 4.54 log reduction in viral load. That's near complete eradication of virus, for those of you unfamiliar with the logarithmic scale.

Unfortunately for Vertex, ALS-2200 has not cleared any meaningful long-term safety hurdles and the drug remains years behind Gilead's compounds. I would put Vertex on the "watch and wait" list, but that's it.

As I have discussed before, it's hard for me to get excited about the other Hep C players. Abbott(ABT) has a seemingly decent trio of drug candidates in later-stage development, but the impending spin off of AbbVie -- Abbott's pharma business -- makes the new company nearly completely dependent on the multi-blockbuster rheumatoid arthritis drug Humira.

Johnson & Johnson's(JNJ) TMC-435 looks solid but lacks an obvious companion unless the company partners with Gilead or physicians, on their own, decide to combine TMC-435 with Gilead's GS-7977 into an "off label" all-oral Hep C regimen -- an idea that BioMedTracker's Tucker believes is a real possibility. Finally, everyone wants me to like Achillion Pharmaceuticals, but there is no shortage of NS5A or protease inhibitors -- the company has two NS5As and a protease inhibitor -- so I can't get that excited.

Ironically given the longstanding investor skepticism, Gilead appears likely to dominate the Hep C market over the next decade. I still worry the company vastly overpaid for Pharmasset, but that concern will be meaningful only if something goes wrong and investors are looking for a cudgel with which to beat management. Otherwise, it's time for investors to start thinking logically about the real size of the Hep C treatment market. It's going to be hard for any company to make big money if there aren't enough Hep C patients to treat.

Disclosure: Sadeghi has no positions in any of the stocks mentioned in this article.

Novartis restructures HCV licensing deal with Idenix...

Posted on 8/1/2012 on PharmaTimes.com. It seems like subtle change is afoot in the HCV drug development field. Gilead announced that it would co-formulate GS-5855 and GS-7977 into one pill with an expected launch date of 2014 and Vertex posted earnings well below expectations of Wall Street on lower-than-anticipated sales of Incivek. Now, Novartis announces it is restructuring it's licensing deal with Idenix, giving the latter company back it's development rights for it's HCV pipeline. We can only speculate on why the rights were handed back to Idenix, but I'm sure Gilead's bold announcement and the post-EASL dampening of the current marketplace and it's chilling effect on the life cycles of the first generation of anti-HCV drugs didn't offer any remedy for cold feet.


Idenix gets rights back to pipeline from Novartis
WORLD NEWS | AUGUST 01, 2012

KEVIN GROGAN

Idenix Pharmaceuticals has regained the rights to hepatitis C compounds that were partnered with Novartis and announced plans to raise $150 million.

The US firm and the Swiss major first teamed up in May 2003 when the latter purchased a 54% stake in Idenix and licensed the hepatitis B treatment Tyzeka/Sebivo (telbivudine). Under the original agreement, Novartis had the option to license any of Idenix' candidates after proof-of-concept, so long as it maintained at least a 30% stake.

Novartis currently has a 31% holding but the pact has now been restructured. The option to license Idenix's development-stage drug candidates in any therapeutic area has been terminated and Novartis will be entitled to royalties on future hepatitis C virus drugs.

Novartis will have a non-exclusive option to conduct trials evaluating a combination of any of its and Idenix' HCV drug candidates, and the latter firm will no longer receive royalty or milestone payments from Tyzeka/Sebivo sales. The Basel-headquartered group will retain the right to designate one member to Idenix's board, reduced from two, as long as it continues to own at least a 15% stake.

Ron Renaud, Idenix chief executive, said the new agreement gives the firm "increased flexibility to optimise the value of our pipeline". By regaining the worldwide rights to all its drug candidates, "we believe Idenix will be well-positioned to develop pan-genotypic all-oral direct-acting antiviral combination treatments with potential collaborators," he added.

As the restructured deal was being announced, Idenix noted that it has commenced an underwritten registered public offering of $150 million of its common stock.

The proceeds will be used to develop combination Phase IIb trials of its HCV drugs IDX184 and IDX719, and Phase IIa studies with IDX19368 in combination with ribavirin. The funds may also be used to "potential acquisitions of new businesses, technologies or products that Idenix believes complements or expands its business".

Vertex stock falls as Leerink Swann reduces sales forecast for Telaprevir...

Posted on Business Week today. Leerink Swann analyst cut his sales forecast for Telaprevir by 35% and target share price from $66 to $48 based on the current hyper-aggressive development space  for interferon-free therapy. It was only a matter of time once Pharmasset launched their broadside at AASLD 2011. This is a ground-breaking product, but burdened with a sharply curtailed life cycle.

Vertex Falls as Analyst Cuts Hep C Sales Estimate: Boston Mover
January 30, 2012, 6:40 PM EST
By Drew Armstrong

Jan. 30 (Bloomberg) -- Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. fell the most in seven weeks after an analyst with Leerink Swann & Co. cut sales estimates for a hepatitis C pill made by the company that was approved by U.S. regulators last year.
Vertex’s Incivek, among the first new hepatitis C drugs to reach the market in almost a decade, may be eclipsed by new pill-only treatments with fewer side effects and shorter courses of treatment. Incivek is given with interferon, an injected medicine. Merck & Co.’s similar pill, Victrelis, was also approved last year.
Shares of Cambridge, Massachusetts-based Vertex fell 3.5 percent to $34.74 at the close in New York, their biggest one- day drop since Dec. 8.
Howard Liang, an analyst with Leerink Swann in Boston, reduced his sales forecast for Incivek by 35 percent from $2.3 billion this year to $1.5 billion. Liang also cut his target price for Vertex shares from $66 to $48.
“In light of recent development of interferon-free regimens and likely more aggressive development as a result of recent transactions in the space, we are further curtailing the Incivek tail,” Liang said in a note to clients today.
Vertex had $420 million in revenue from Incivek in the third quarter of 2011. Revenue from the drug accounts for 64 percent of the company’s sales.
--Editors: Angela Zimm, Adriel Bettelheim
To contact the reporter on this story: Drew Armstrong in Washington at darmstrong17@bloomberg.net;
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Reg Gale at rgale5@bloomberg.net

Small Cap Network.com on Hepatitis C drug development....

The Hepatitis C Race Is On: MRK, VRTX, VRUS, ACHN, PFE, IDIX

By James E. Brumley

Published: September 21, 2011 10:24:49 AM PDT

The race for an effective hepatitis C treatment may not be as high-profile as, say efforts to find a cure for cancer or HIV. It's a bigger market than most may imagine though, judging from the number of companies doing R&D in the arena. Here's a quick look at the key one.

Merck & Co., Inc. (NYSE:MRK) has one of only two FDA-approved hepatitis C drugs. Its version is called Victrelis - a protease inhibitor. It was only approved in May, so there's no sales momentum yet. If the efficacy seen in Phase II testing is any clue though, it should be a revenue driver. Merck said two-thirds of patients receiving Victrelis in combination with other treatments had a strong virologic response in that the virus was no longer detected in the blood six months weeks after the treatment was stopped.

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Incorporated (NASDAQ:VRTX) has the other FDA-approved hepatitis C treatment. Theirs is called Incivek - another protease inhibitor. Vertex's entry in the race seems even better than Merck's; nearly 80% of patients saw no sign of the irus in the blood 24 weeks after treatment.

Pharmasset, Inc. (NASDAQ:VRUS) is anything but a household name, and its drug is only in Phase II testing. But, PSI-7977 (a nucleoside polymerase inhibitor) is very promising. When used in combination with interferon and ribavirin, Pharmasset produces a 12-week sustained virological response rate of 91% for previously untreated hepatitis C patients.

Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:ACHN) actually has several versions of its treatment currently anywhere from pre-clinical studies to Phase II trials. They're all built on the same basic platform though; all act as protease inhibitors. The underlying mechanism for these compounds is novel, targeting the NS4A protein of HCV. By inhibiting this target, Achillion Pharmaceuticals says the formation of a functional replicase complex (a key step in viral replication of the viral RNA genome) is blocked. ACH-1625 is the one to watch closely now.

Update/Correction: Achillion is exploring two distinct programs - protease inhibitors and NS5A inhibitors. The protease inhibitor program includes its lead Phase 2 compound ACH-1625, while the Phase 1 program is evaluating a novel pan-genotypic compound designated ACH-2684. The second class of compounds the company is developing are NS5A inhibitors, and is the backbone ACH-2928 (also in Phase 1 development).

Pfizer Inc. (NYSE:PFE) is in the hepatitis C race, but for a company of it size and financial backing, it's surprisingly lagging. Its polymerase inhibitor (PF-868554) is only in Phase II trials right now. Given the lateness of the effort and the fact that Pfizer has multiple partners on this front, it's hard to say HCV is a priority its going to push forward in a meaningful way.

Finally, Idenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ:IDIX) has a small army of hepatitis C treatment in the hopper (four in all, but they're all significantly different than one another). The one that's furthest along is IDX184, currently in Phase II, while work on IDX320 has been halted for the time being. Idenix Pharmaceuticals began 12-week trials of IDX184 in July of this year, and is expected to share interim results sometime in the fourth quarter. IDX184 has also been halted - albeit temporary - in the past by the FDA over safety concerns.

The hepatitis C market could be worth as much as $10 billion within five years, according to industry analysts. It affects tens of million of people worldwide every year.

Zacks Equity Research on Telaprevir approval in Canada...

Analyst Blog
Vertex's Incivek Approved in Canada
By: Zacks Equity Research
August 23, 2011 |

Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. (VRTX - Snapshot Report) recently announced that the Canadian regulatory body has approved Incivek (telaprevir), for treating patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (HCV) with compensated liver disease, including cirrhosis (scarring of the liver). We note that even though the liver is damaged in patients with compensated liver disease it still functions.

The drug is to be used in combination with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin for the treatment of HCV in both treatment-naïve and treatment-failed patients.

We note that Incivek was approved in the US in May 2011 for the treatment of HCV. Further, during the second quarter of 2011, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended the approval of Incivek in the European Union (EU) as a treatment for HCV. Partner Johnson & Johnson (JNJ - Analyst Report) anticipates a response from the European regulatory body in the third quarter of 2011. Following the approval, Incivek will be marketed in the EU and certain other territories under the brand name Incivo.

Vertex Pharma has exclusive US commercialization rights to Incivek and has joined hands with Johnson & Johnson and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma for the commercialization of the drug outside the US. While Johnson & Johnson is responsible for the commercialization of Incivek outside North America and the Far East, Mitsubishi Pharma will market it in certain areas of the Far East including Japan.

Mitsubishi Tanabe filed for the regulatory approval of Incivek in Japan in January 2011.

The drug which faces competition from Merck & Co. Inc.’s (MRK - Analyst Report) Victrelis, recorded sales of $74.5 million during the second quarter of 2011 (first quarter of the drug’s launch), and helped limit the loss of Vertex Pharma at 82 cents.

Riding on the strong sales of Incivek, total revenue during the second quarter soared 262% to $114.4 million, surpassing the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $54 million. (Read our full coverage on the earnings report at: Incivek Limits Vertex's Losses)

Our View

We currently have a Neutral recommendation on Vertex Pharma. The stock carries a Zacks #3 Rank (Hold rating) in the short-run. We are pleased with the Canadian approval of Incivek as it’s the only marketed drug at Vertex Pharma and, we believe that Incivek will help the company post positive earnings.